Astro Boy

I love that this kid has purple angular hair in a movie where all the architecture is Art Deco Streamline.



Does this dog have two sets of ears? Somehow, this does not freak me out as much as I would expect it to.


There is a little bit of the rustic look in this movie and there is some texture. More texture than "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" and less texture than "9".



The coloring in this movie is similar to "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" though the color scheme seems more exact in this movie where as "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" used the entire rainbow. However, both movies feature soft colors with soft facial features and lots of light.

Astro Boy seems to have a very Pinochio type aspect to him in that he is a "real boy" but does not have a real body.


It seems that robots in the movies are big in the past couple of years; "Astro Boy", "9" and "Iron Man" all are lighting up the big screen. All these movies have a common theme which is that technology has its strengths and weaknesses; its positive aspects and its damaging ones. What's thought provoking is that all of these movies have successfully communicated this message with different aesthetics and set in different time periods/worlds.

Cloudy with a Chance of Meat Balls

The first thing I notice about this movie is that the color scheme is bright and the textures are soft. It is not vintage looking at all which is very different than most movies sci-fi/fantasy movies coming out right now.

Lots of light too. This is again contrasting to most of the chiaroscuro type lighting in the vintage movies.


Cute, round, soft fur, hair, colors and skin tones.


Notice all of the materials appear to be new and not old and beat up like in "9".


The interesting thing about this, is that the book "cloudy with a chance of meatballs" has very iconic illustrations. http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2009/03/chanceofmeatballs.html , http://ny-image3.etsy.com/il_430xN.52494531.jpg , https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhagB2a4X8cFnYdjDxAZTH9l572LU00zGhdtwfzavOWJcZOwOyVcmPb7yIz_oLF20tZETCbA3cAmMgKEQl68S-2jXX5GDPjDH_l-1csO9jWdxE0kei8-9L8VXrnJ_ji6XaA7wY_BqGP3q9M/s400/hamburgers.jpg. They are pen ink drawings with lots of texture and light coloring. The look of this movie is very different from the book. I think the producers were right to avoid the vintage look with this particular movie for a few reasons 1) it is much more fun bright, 2) the vintage look copied from a book is already being done with "where the wild things are" at the moment. I wonder however, if the plain jane rainbow look with resonate with viewers and if they would have been more emotionally invested if the movie looked more like the book.

Images from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844471/mediaindex?page=1

9

Whatever these guys are, they appear to be small in size. That is why the texture is so strong. It's a close up view of things they are made out of, thus making the texture more visible than it might normally be.

The textures are realistic and there is a large variety of materials shown in every shot. In this image we see several different kinds of metal, wood, textiles, paper. Notice his fingers are calligraphy pen tips and he has been drawing. Very clever.


More reused materials are shown in this screen shot. Namely zippers, ropes and buttons.


Everything appears to be very old, rusty and dirty. It's not hard to figure out that this movie is set in the future and most likely has some sort of commentary on environmental issues (as that is the case with many fantasy movies these days). What I find more interesting is the "realness" of the materials and their environment. This is a really interesting video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKTAJBQSm10 which talks about why we like things that have human attributes and why we don't like cg animation that looks almost like a real human because it gives us the creeps. Seeing a animated cg face can be really creepy because it lacks a genuine quality.

I wonder how much this concept of the Valley relates to how we view "real" cg animated materials. More specifically, how we feel about a texture looking perfectly real on a creature which we know does not exist. This was also the case with the creatures on "Where the wild things are" because they were composed of costumes with cg animated faces. The creatures in 9 are entirely cg animated but have the same concept of creatures with detailed textures. I think rather than creeping me out (like the realist looking cg human face), these creatures really stir me up emotionally. They evoke a positive reaction because I so love to pretend fantasy creatures exist and this is just one step closer to making them seem more real.

Images from http://www.imdb.com/media/rm840861696/tt0472033

What do wild things look like?

Where the Wild Things Are, written and illustrated by Maurice Sendak, has been made into a major motion picture. Sendak's work is so unique in style and has such a huge fan base that the movie makers were smart to keep the look of the movie as close to look of the illustrations as they could. They used the same costuming and color scheme featured in the book. Who knew big burly brown monsters could be so cute!

Movie Preview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFDcaTI0cl8

Another smart move on the part of the director Spike Jonze was to use a combination of costumes and cg animation. In some ways it feels like they are puppets but they also have a realistic quality to them. Their movement is normal enough but not like any one animal so they have a bit of a magical quality. They sort of bounce and are somewhat weighed down like an elephant moving slow. Seeing the fur fly about against the background of a real forest and ocean landscape is emotionally stirring because it makes them seem more realistic.


The return to costumes instead of complete cg animation of the characters could also be a response to people wanting "things" that feel real and have a permanence about them. This response could be due to the recognition that disposable items are not environmentally friendly. Things that seem like they are not permanent in our lives feel like excess. Digital animation has its brilliance and purpose, but it can also have a way of seeming distant compared to something that looks visually real. The realness is in the "real" materials of their costumes. In the same way that Toy Story and Shrek were break-throughs when they came out, this movie could be a break through in that it is returning to hands on craft such as costume making and the connected feeling of "real".

scheduled to come out October 16, 2009.

Images from
Movie http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386117/mediaindex
Book http://blog.al.com/nightlife/2007/10/wildthings.jpg
http://worldsstrongestlibrarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/where-the-wild-things-are.jpg

Architecture and Apparel in Wonderland

Anne Hathaway plays The White Queen. She looks as though she could turn her hand over, drop the mouse, and maintain that expression. Beautiful yet cold. The dress is obviously period looking but is different than more vintage looking costuming of Bellatrix Lestrange from the Harry Potter movies or the corseted outfits seen on So you think you can dance (as mentioned in previous blogs). This dress is large, frilly, covers more and is meant to look more beautiful rather than sexy. Like most of the costumes in the movie it is a combination of Renaissance and Victorian influence.


The White Queen's castle appears to have elements of Gothic and Baroque architecture but its hard to tell without seeing more.




Helena B Carter plays The Red Queen who looks very Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth in stature and costume. (The Painting of Queen Elizabeth was painted during the Early Renaissance and the painting of Henry VIII was painted during the High Renaissance).






The architecture of the Red Castle appears to be Gothic. Some of the architectural elements that lead me to believe so are the Corinthian columns, stained glass windows as well as equilateral (middle) and lancet (on the sides) arches. It seems many of the screen shots from the preview also have a chiaroscuro lighting effect which means there is a high dark and light contrast. The term is used to describe art during the Renaissance especially.

Images from
Still shots from the preview: http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi4240966169/
http://sassafrasjunction.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/henry_viii.jpg
http://www.stosyth.gov.uk/default.asp?calltype=jun03elizabethone

Alice in Wonderland Directed by Tim Burton and Influenced by Drugs?

Tim Burton is once again pushing boundaries that ought to be pushed. The images from the upcoming Alice in Wonderland movie which is based on the beloved book by Lewis Carroll, are absolutely brilliant.

Teaser Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiPR6kA4_iU

This movie poster looks like the Victorian era on acid or rather absinthe, which is actually not a far fetched idea. Both opiates and absinthe were popular drugs when the book was published in 1865. Throughout the book there are constant references to drugs. Most notably the mysterious liquids and mushrooms Alice consumes to manipulate her body size and also whatever the caterpillar is smoking.



Several famous artists during the time when the book was published have also used the substance as subject matter.

There is speculation that the artworks of the impressionist artists are bright in color and have a hazy appearance because the artists were using absinthe. The use of the drug didn't always have such beautiful outcomes. Some think that Vincent van Gogh cut off his ear due to absinthe (http://www.absinthealchemist.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13&Itemid=28).

So why did Carroll use drugs as such a strong theme in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland? Well there are two main theories about this but neither can be confirmed with proof. The first theory is that Carroll used drugs himself. A quick Google search entitled "Lewis Carroll on Drugs?" will turn up 11,900 results of blogs, biographies and articles. The other theory is that Carroll could have been trying to reach people about the harmful effects of drug use (http://www.studyworld.com/newsite/ReportEssay/Literature/Novel%5CLewis_Carrolls_Brainchild-38946.htm).

I will be very interested to see if Tim Burton puts any modern twists on the story that have to do any of the worlds current problems. Namely, environmental issues.

Should anyone feel inspired to read the book before seeing the movie here is an online copy.
http://www.literature.org/authors/carroll-lewis/alices-adventures-in-wonderland/

Release date for the movie is not until March 5, 2010

Images from
http://wahooart.com/A55A04/w.nsf/Opra/BRUE-5ZKCBU?OpenDocument&ChangeLangue=ES
http://www.artquotes.net/masters/picasso/pablo_absinth1901.htm
http://www.vangoghgallery.com/painting/starryindex.html
http://store.encore-editions.com/Artists/degas.html

Twilight

I love Twilight, not only because I live in the Pacific Northwest and that is where this movie was filmed, but because its a great movie. We don't often get to closely examine the emotions and relationships that fantasy creatures have with friends and loved ones. That is more or less the trend with this movie; the emotional aspect, the music, the teenage subject matter. The trend is to create fantasy movies (and shows such as True Blood and Heroes) that feel as if they are apart of the real world. But what does that look like in terms of design?

Despite the fact that Edward sparkles in the sun, the only major sparks flying in this movie are between Bella and Edward. There are no scenes with wands or spells and so the aesthetic has to be more carefully crafted so that the movie communicates fantasy. There are a few computer animated scenes like when Edward saves Bella from the van or the baseball scene which highlights super strength abilities, but what really sets the mood for the movie is the costumes of the characters and the scenery.

Bella is dressed unassuming but she also looks like she is tough. She is dressed in Tee-shirts and jeans throughout most of the movie.

Victoria is amazing. She looks like a glamazon and fights like a warrior. Notice the "vintage Victorian punk" gear on her arm. Her fur coat further symbolizes her "do not mess with me" personality. For all we know she could have killed the animal she got that fur from.

Is it just me or does this guy remind you of Edward Scissor hands? Handsome yet freaky. His collared shirt and mostly maintained hair is nearly perfect, as if he is trying to hold himself together but could snap at any moment. And she is adorable. A cute vampire?

Image Sources

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1099212/mediaindex